The authors named above have discovered a small error in the calibration of marine radiocarbon ages in our recent review and compilation of the glacial history of the Antarctic Peninsula. These ages have been corrected and a revised supplementary dataset is presented, which should replace Table 2 and the Supplementary information. The calculation error is small, typically of the order of 5–10%, and does not influence the overall findings of the study
The original version of this Article contained an error in the Data Availability section, which inco...
In the original article, there were mistakes in Tables 2–4 and associated legends and text as publis...
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper
The authors named above have discovered a small error in the calibration of marine radiocarbon ages ...
International audienceWhen this paper was originally published there was an error in Table 1. The ag...
correctionappended at the end of this reprint. The erratum is available online at: An erratum has be...
International audienceThe original version of this Article contained formatting errors in Table 1. T...
It has been brought to our attention that Table 2 in the paper by Carrivick et al. (2022) “A reconst...
The online version of the original article can be found under doi: 10.1007/s00382-012-1402-4. (https...
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0149-
In the above paper the wrong figure was printed as Fig. 6 on page 411. The correct figure is given ...
It has been brought to our attention, following a recent publication by Barrell et al. (2019), that ...
International audienceThere are two significant typographical errors in Cande et al. (2010)
It has been brought to our attention, following a recent publication by Barrell et al. (2019), that ...
The original version of this Article contained an error in the Data Availability section, which inco...
In the original article, there were mistakes in Tables 2–4 and associated legends and text as publis...
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper
The authors named above have discovered a small error in the calibration of marine radiocarbon ages ...
International audienceWhen this paper was originally published there was an error in Table 1. The ag...
correctionappended at the end of this reprint. The erratum is available online at: An erratum has be...
International audienceThe original version of this Article contained formatting errors in Table 1. T...
It has been brought to our attention that Table 2 in the paper by Carrivick et al. (2022) “A reconst...
The online version of the original article can be found under doi: 10.1007/s00382-012-1402-4. (https...
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0149-
In the above paper the wrong figure was printed as Fig. 6 on page 411. The correct figure is given ...
It has been brought to our attention, following a recent publication by Barrell et al. (2019), that ...
International audienceThere are two significant typographical errors in Cande et al. (2010)
It has been brought to our attention, following a recent publication by Barrell et al. (2019), that ...
The original version of this Article contained an error in the Data Availability section, which inco...
In the original article, there were mistakes in Tables 2–4 and associated legends and text as publis...
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper